For a length of time, Adobe Photoshop has been the leading program in image editing. “Photoshop” has even been made a language of common culture and people know it to mean digitally modifying an image. But then a new competitor came along: Adobe Lightroom.
It bragged having great features and looked similar, but yet different than Photoshop.
While they both share several similarities, and both programs are widely used by the community of photographers, they each play a unique role and are different in some major ways. Understanding Lightroom 3 vs photoshop can help you make a wise decision in choosing an ideal software for your photo editing needs.
Let us now take a look at the explained differences between these two programs:
The most crucial way in which Lightroom is different from Photoshop is the fact that it does edit photos, nor does it move your pictures to various locations in your primary computer. Instead, it keeps a history of all changes in a separate file namely the Catalog, which equates a recipe book of a set of instructions for processing each image.
Whenever you do any edition, it keeps a history of all the modifications in a database, while leaving the original image unchanged. With the original image intact you can go back and redo the photo any other time you want. This approach is what is referred as nondestructive editing.
An additional benefit of this form of approach is the fact that the catalog itself is small, often taking less space on your hard drive irrespective of the number of images you have in Lightroom.
Photoshop, however, functions quite differently. When you modify an image such as a PNG, JPG, or RAW file in Photoshop you are often working on the original file itself unless you keep a copy as a Photoshop PSD file that occupies huge space of the hard drive.
This PSD file contains modifications made to a photo, and to share a given photo one must save it then have it saved to a final format such as PNG, JPG, etc. In essence, if you want to do nondestructive editing in Photoshop you will come out with three different files: the original cam RAW file, a PSD, and the final copy kept into a shareable form from the PSD.
Lightroom is is fast and nimble and can be used for a variety of tasks. It is a one easy to use editing tool suitable for photographers with hundreds of photos to edit. Lightroom works linearly and is not layered, fewer editing apparatus and less general flexibility. It narrows down to the tools frequently used by photographers making it appealing to several shutterbugs. Photoshop, by contrast, works by letting you create layers which your actual edits will occur.
Photoshop contains several arrays of brushes, filters and other different tools that enable you to conduct all sorts of edits to your images. This makes Photoshop possess massive editing power and is suitable for any image-editing scenario. Photoshop is ideal for almost any image-editing situation. Lightroom essentially distils Photoshop down to the tools that Photographers use most, which is one reason it is so appealing to many shutterbugs.
Lightroom has the trump card which enables it to produce an end to end workflow remedy for photographers. It is explicitly designed to suit the needs of amateurs and professionals since it caters for everything from importing photos, organizing, making changes, sharing, display and printing. Lightroom supports keywords and virtual folders to aid you to keep a trace of your photos which enables you to create slides and photo books. On the other hand, Photoshop does not transfer files, organize images, and cannot make slides or photo books.